ToliveintheUnitedStatestodayis-名校题库网

To live in the United States today is to gain an appreciation for Dahrendorf′s assertion that social change exists everywhere. Technology, the application of knowledge for practical ends, is a major source of social change.

Yet we would do well to remind ourselves that technology is a human creation; it does not exist naturally. A spear or a robot is as much a cultural as a physical object. Until humans use a spear to hunt game or a robot to produce machine parts, neither is much more than a solid mass of matter. For a bird looking for an object on which to rest, a spear or robot serves the purpose equally well. The explosion of the Challenger space shuttle and the Russian nuclear accident at Chernobyl drive home the human quality of technology; they provide cases in which well-planned systems suddenly went haywire and there was no ready hand to set them right. Since technology is a human creation, we are responsible for what is done with it. Pessimists worry that we will use our technology eventually to blow our world and ourselves to pieces. But they have been saying this for decades, and so far we have managed to survive and even flourish. Whether we will continue to do so in the years ahead remains uncertain. Clearly, the impact of technology on our lives deserves a closer examination.

Few technological developments have had a greater impact on our lives than the computer revolution. Scientists and engineers have designed specialized machines that can do the tasks that once only people could do. There are those who assert that the switch to an information-based economy is in the same camp as other great historical milestones, particularly the Industrial Revolution. Yet when we ask why the Industrial Revolution was a revolution, we find that it was not the machines. The primary reason why it was revolutionary is that it led to great social change. It gave rise to mass production and, through mass production, to a society in which wealth was not c

A.keen insight into the nature of technology
B.prejudiced criticism of the role of the industrial Revolution
C.cautious analysis of the replacement of the human mind by computers
D.exaggerated description of the negative consequences of technology

查看答案纠错

答案： A

本题解析：

推断题。题干意为“这篇文章是基于作者的__________”。A项“对技术本质的精辟洞察力”， B项“对工业革命的作用带有偏见的批判”，C项“对人类思维被计算机取代的谨慎分析”，D项“对技术的负面影响的夸张描述”。B、C两项在原文找不到作者的相关观点；D项虽然文中提到了技术带来的负面影响，却没有对此进行夸大的描述，此三项均可排除。故选A。