当前位置：首页 → 职业资格 → 教师资格 → 中学英语学科知识与教学能力->根据题目要求完成下列任务。用中文作答。下面是某初中课堂教学片
根据题目要求完成下列任务。用中文作答。
下面是某初中课堂教学片段。
T: (referring to a picture) where is John, Li Lei
S 1: He has gone to Shanghai.
T: How many times has he been to Shanghai
S 1: He has been to Shanghai for only once.
T: (referring to another picture) where is Mary, Wang Wei
S2: She has gone to the library.
T: How many times has she been to the library a week
S2: She has been to the librarytwice a week.
根据上面所提供的信息，从下面四个方面作答：
(1)此教学片段的教学目标是什么
(2)教师采用了何种教学方法
(3)该教学方法有何优缺点
(4)提出两条主要建议，解决该教学方法可能带来的问题。
(1)本教学片段目标如下： 知识目标：学生熟练练习如何使用现在完成时，能够听懂提问How many times has he／shebeen to…并运用He／She has gone to／been to…进行应答。
能力目标：通过师生问答，学生能够提高语言思维能力和初步运用英语交际的能力，并能够在相似的生活情境中运用所学语言，达到交流目的。
情感目标：通过师生问答．学生能够了解和关心他人。
(2)教师采用了情景教学法。在课堂中，教师通过展示图片，将情景引入，引起学生一定的体验，帮助学生理解句式并在情景中进行操练，达到教学目标。
(3)情景教学法优缺点如下：
优点：
①情景教学以其直观性、趣味性、生动性，激发了学生的参与和学习欲望。
②情景在语法教学中的应用，改变了在日常以往单纯记忆语法规则的学习方式，将枯燥的语法规则融入一定的语言情景中，使教学呈现更加真实化和生动化。
③针对性强。这种方式更有利于教师发现教学中存在的问题，及时掌握教学效果，并对教学内容做出相应的调整．提高效率。
④时效性强。这种教学法需要不断更新教学内容，克服了传统教学模式下内容陈旧的问题，教师必须对学生学习过程中发生的新问题进行解答，使教师所教内容的时效性更强。
缺点：
①学生被动接受语言材料的输入。
②过于重视语言形式，忽视交际能力的培养。
③过分强调目的语结构的机械训练和语音的准确性，对语义关注不足。
④由于情景的设计常常是虚构的，因而情境中的话语并不能最大限度地满足学生语言交际的实际需要。
(4)建议：①加大对语义关注，可以在完成对话以后运用归纳法帮助学生归纳出语法规则，使其真正理解和运用所学知识。②改善情景设计的虚构缺点，在虚构情景后，可以进一步组织同桌或小组练习，以其真实情况作为背景信息。运用所学句式，进行问答练习，来提高学生实际语言交际能力。
Passage 1
Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recently years it has been particularly scorned．School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on this educational ritual．Unfortunately, L.A．Unified has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses,homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student′ s academic grade.
This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework．But the policy is unclear and contradictory．Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot complete on their own or that they cannot do without expensive equipment．But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.
District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling; teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want．But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards．Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped．Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a fiat, across-the-board rule.
At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework．If the district finds homework to be unimportant to its students′ academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing．Conversely, if homework matters, it should account for a significant portion of the grade．Meanwhile, this policy does nothing to ensure that the homework students receive is meaningful or appropriate to their age and the subject, or that teachers are not assigning more than they are willing to review and correct.
The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings．It is not too late for L.A.Unified to do homework right.
A suitable title for this text could be__________.
Passage 1
Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recently years it has been particularly scorned．School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on this educational ritual．Unfortunately, L.A．Unified has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses,homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student′ s academic grade.
This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework．But the policy is unclear and contradictory．Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot complete on their own or that they cannot do without expensive equipment．But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.
District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling; teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want．But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards．Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped．Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a fiat, across-the-board rule.
At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework．If the district finds homework to be unimportant to its students′ academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing．Conversely, if homework matters, it should account for a significant portion of the grade．Meanwhile, this policy does nothing to ensure that the homework students receive is meaningful or appropriate to their age and the subject, or that teachers are not assigning more than they are willing to review and correct.
The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings．It is not too late for L.A.Unified to do homework right.
As mentioned in Paragraph 4, a key question unanswered about homework is whether__________.
Passage 1
Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recently years it has been particularly scorned．School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on this educational ritual．Unfortunately, L.A．Unified has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses,homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student′ s academic grade.
This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework．But the policy is unclear and contradictory．Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot complete on their own or that they cannot do without expensive equipment．But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.
District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling; teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want．But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards．Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped．Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a fiat, across-the-board rule.
At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework．If the district finds homework to be unimportant to its students′ academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing．Conversely, if homework matters, it should account for a significant portion of the grade．Meanwhile, this policy does nothing to ensure that the homework students receive is meaningful or appropriate to their age and the subject, or that teachers are not assigning more than they are willing to review and correct.
The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings．It is not too late for L.A.Unified to do homework right.
According to Paragraph 3, one problem with the policy is that it may__________
Passage 1
Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recently years it has been particularly scorned．School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on this educational ritual．Unfortunately, L.A．Unified has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses,homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student′ s academic grade.
This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework．But the policy is unclear and contradictory．Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot complete on their own or that they cannot do without expensive equipment．But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.
District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling; teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want．But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards．Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped．Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a fiat, across-the-board rule.
At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework．If the district finds homework to be unimportant to its students′ academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing．Conversely, if homework matters, it should account for a significant portion of the grade．Meanwhile, this policy does nothing to ensure that the homework students receive is meaningful or appropriate to their age and the subject, or that teachers are not assigning more than they are willing to review and correct.
The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings．It is not too late for L.A.Unified to do homework right.
L.A．Unified has made the rule about homework mainly because poor students__________.
Passage 1
Homework has never been terribly popular with students and even many parents, but in recently years it has been particularly scorned．School districts across the country, most recently Los Angeles Unified, are revising their thinking on this educational ritual．Unfortunately, L.A．Unified has produced an inflexible policy which mandates that with the exception of some advanced courses,homework may no longer count for more than 10% of a student′ s academic grade.
This rule is meant to address the difficulty that students from impoverished or chaotic homes might have in completing their homework．But the policy is unclear and contradictory．Certainly, no homework should be assigned that students cannot complete on their own or that they cannot do without expensive equipment．But if the district is essentially giving a pass to students who do not do their homework because of complicated family lives, it is going riskily close to the implication that standards need to be lowered for poor children.
District administrators say that homework will still be a part of schooling; teachers are allowed to assign as much of it as they want．But with homework counting for no more than 10% of their grades, students can easily skip half their homework and see very little difference on their report cards．Some students might do well on state tests without completing their homework, but what about the students who performed well on the tests and did their homework? It is quite possible that the homework helped．Yet rather than empowering teachers to find what works best for their students, the policy imposes a fiat, across-the-board rule.
At the same time, the policy addresses none of the truly thorny questions about homework．If the district finds homework to be unimportant to its students′ academic achievement, it should move to reduce or eliminate the assignments, not make them count for almost nothing．Conversely, if homework matters, it should account for a significant portion of the grade．Meanwhile, this policy does nothing to ensure that the homework students receive is meaningful or appropriate to their age and the subject, or that teachers are not assigning more than they are willing to review and correct.
The homework rules should be put on hold while the school board, which is responsible for setting educational policy, looks into the matter and conducts public hearings．It is not too late for L.A.Unified to do homework right.
It is implied in Paragraph 1 that nowadays homework
根据提供的信息和语言素材设计教学方案，用英文作答。
设计任务：请阅读下面学生信息和语言素材，设计15分钟的英语阅读教学方案。教案没有固定格式，但须包含下列要点：
? teaching objectives
? teaching contents
? key and difficult points
?major steps and time allocation
? activities and justifications
教学时间：15分钟
学生概况：某城镇普通中学初中二年级第一学期学生，班级人数40人。多数学生已经达到《义务教育英语课程标准(2011年版)》三级水平。学生课堂参与积极性一般。
语言素材：
根据题目要求完成下列任务，用中文作答。
下面是某课堂实录的核心环节内容。
核心环节1：感知体验
1．引入话题sports，复习并引入新的表示运动的目标词汇并教授be good at结构。
T: Spring is a good season to do sports, fight? Ss: Yes.
T: Do you like sports? Ss: Yes.
T: What sport are you good at?S1: I am good at basketball.
T: Good．And you? S2: I am good at table tennis.
T: What sport are you good at?S3: I am good at skiing.
2．引入描述运动的形容词。
T：What sport do you think is dangerous?S3：Skiing．
T：What sport do you think is boring?S4：CyCling．
核心环节2：运用
T：Can you work in pairs and compare sports?
S：Football is more tiring than swimming．
S：Running is more popular than gynmastics．
T：Good．Another pair?
根据上面的信息，从下面两个方面作答：
(1)从课堂问答角度对案例进行评析。(15分)
(2)从学生互动方面对案例进行评析。(15分)
根据题目要求完成下列任务，用中文作答。
简述语法教学中常用的两种教学方法和其优缺点。
John had never been abroad before, __________he found the business trip very exciting.
Which of the letter "p" in the following words has a different pronunciation from others?
