Passage 7
In a rare unanimous ruling,the US Supreme Court has overturned the corruption conviction of a former Virginia governor,Robert McDonnell.But it did so while holding its nose at the ethics of his conduct,which included accepting gifts such as a Rolex watch and a Ferrari Automobile from a company seeking access to government.
The high court’s decision said the judge in Mr.McDonnell’s trail failed to tell a jury that it must look only at his“official acts,”or the former governor’s decisions on“specific”and“unsettled”issues related to his duties.
Merely helping a gift-giver gain access to other officials,unless done with clear intent to pressure those officials,is not corruption,the justices found.
The court did suggest that accepting favors in return for opening doors is“distasteful”and“nasty.”But under anti-bribery laws,proof must be made of concrete benefits,such as approval of a contract or regulation.Simply arranging a meeting,making a phone call,or hosting an event is not an“official act.”
The court’s ruling is legally sound in defining a kind of favoritism that is not criminal.Elected leaders must be allowed to help supporters deal with bureaucratic problems without fear of prosecution of bribery.“The basic compact underlying representative government,”wrote Chief Justice John Roberts for the court,“assumes that public officials will hear from their constituents and act on their concerns.”
But the ruling reinforces the need for citizens and their elected representatives,not the courts,to ensure equality of access to government.Officials must not be allowed to play favorites in providing information or in arranging meetings simply because an individual or group provides a campaign donation or a personal gift.This type of integrity requires will-enforced laws in government transparency,such as records of official meetings,rules on lobbying,and information about each elected leader’s source of wealth.
Favoritism in official access can fan public perceptions of corruption.But it is not always corruption.Rather officials must avoid double standards,or different types of access for average people and the wealthy.If connections can be bought,a basic premise of democratic society–that all are equal in treatment by government-is undermined.Good government rests on an understanding of the inherent worth of each individual.
The court’s ruling is a step forward in the struggle against both corruption and official favoritism.
Well-enforced laws in government transparency are needed to（ ）.
第六段前面提到to ensure equality of access to government.后面提到This type of integrity requires will-enforced laws in government transparency可知政府系统的公平公正性需要法律的保障。因此正确答案是选项B。
下列关于公司的表述，正确的是（）
以下各项列举了我国常见气象灾害与其发生地区的对应关系，其中正确的一项是（）
根据电视收视率调査，看体育节目的观众中青年人比中老年人要多。
由此可推断出（）
—种海洋蜗牛产生的毒素含有多种蛋白，把其中的一种给老鼠注射后，会使有两星期大或更小的老鼠陷入睡眠状态，而使大一点的老鼠躲藏起来。当老鼠受到突然的严重威胁时，非常小的那些老鼠的反应是呆住，而较大的那些老鼠会逃跑。
以上陈述的事实最有力地支持了以下哪项假说？（）
疾病控制中心对某校髙中三个年级的学生进行抽样做视力状况调查，抽样的方法为分层抽样（按比例抽样），若高中一、二、三年级学生人数分别为626、703、780，样本容量为84，则应从离二年级抽样的学生人数为多少？（）
