当前位置:首页职业资格教师资格中学英语学科知识与教学能力->2021年教师资格证《英语学科知识与教学能力》(初级中学)点睛试卷9

2021年教师资格证《英语学科知识与教学能力》(初级中学)点睛试卷9

卷面总分:33分 答题时间:240分钟 试卷题量:33题 练习次数:91次
单选题 (共30题,共30分)
1.

What should the teacher try to avoid when selecting listening materials?

  • A. The text scripted and recorded in the studio
  • B. The text with implicated concepts beyond the comprehension of students
  • C. The text with local accents in pronunciation
  • D. The text with some difficult words for students
标记 纠错
2.

When a reader tries to guess the meaning of a new word based on the contextual clue,which one of the following approaches is he using?

  • A. Bottom-up approach
  • B. Top-down approach
  • C. Interactive approach
  • D. Situational approach
标记 纠错
3.

Which one is the school's mission and characteristic of the course?

  • A. Local course
  • B. School-based curriculum
  • C. National curriculum
  • D. Subject curriculum
标记 纠错
4.

Which of the following has the proper word stress

  • A. comParison
  • B. Comparison
  • C. compaRison
  • D. comparisON
标记 纠错
5.

The best grouping of teaching when the students are given the task to work out answers to a reading comprehension is__________.

  • A. one-to-one
  • B. groupwork
  • C. pair-work
  • D. solowork
标记 纠错
6.

A new scheme for getting children to and from school is being started by the education authorities in part of Eastern England. This could end the worries of many parents fearful for their children's safety on the roads.

Until now the Country Council has only been prepared to provide bus services for children living more than three miles from their school, or sometimes less if special reasons existed. Now it has been decided that if a group of parents ask for help in organizing transport they will be prepared to go ahead, provided the arrangement will not lose money and that children taking part will be attending their nearest school.

The new scheme is to be tried out this term for children living at Milton who attend Impington school. The children live just within the three-mile limit and the Council has said in the past it will not undertake to provide free transport to the school. But now they have agreed to organize a bus service from Milton to Impington and back, a plan which has the support of the school's headmaster.

Between 50 and 60 parents have said they would like their children to take part in. Final calculations have still to be carried out, but a council official has said the cost of parents should be less than $6.50 a tenn.

They have been able to arrange the service at a low cost because there is already an agreement with the bus company for a bus to take children who live further away to Impington. The same bus would now just make an extra journey to pick up the Milton children. The official said they would get in touch with other groups of parents who in the past had asked if transport could be provided for their children, to see if they would like to take part in the new scheme.

The children the Council ran buses for in the past were those__________.

  • A. whose parents were worried about them
  • B. who would have had to walk otherwise
  • C. who could not walk
  • D. who had to travel a long way
标记 纠错
7.

A new scheme for getting children to and from school is being started by the education authorities in part of Eastern England. This could end the worries of many parents fearful for their children's safety on the roads.

Until now the Country Council has only been prepared to provide bus services for children living more than three miles from their school, or sometimes less if special reasons existed. Now it has been decided that if a group of parents ask for help in organizing transport they will be prepared to go ahead, provided the arrangement will not lose money and that children taking part will be attending their nearest school.

The new scheme is to be tried out this term for children living at Milton who attend Impington school. The children live just within the three-mile limit and the Council has said in the past it will not undertake to provide free transport to the school. But now they have agreed to organize a bus service from Milton to Impington and back, a plan which has the support of the school's headmaster.

Between 50 and 60 parents have said they would like their children to take part in. Final calculations have still to be carried out, but a council official has said the cost of parents should be less than $6.50 a tenn.

They have been able to arrange the service at a low cost because there is already an agreement with the bus company for a bus to take children who live further away to Impington. The same bus would now just make an extra journey to pick up the Milton children. The official said they would get in touch with other groups of parents who in the past had asked if transport could be provided for their children, to see if they would like to take part in the new scheme.

Taking part in the Council's trial schemes are children who__________.

  • A. living in Milton and go to Impington school
  • B. living in Impington and go to Milton school
  • C. living in Milton and go to Milton school
  • D. living in Impington and go to Impington school
标记 纠错
8.

A new scheme for getting children to and from school is being started by the education authorities in part of Eastern England. This could end the worries of many parents fearful for their children's safety on the roads.

Until now the Country Council has only been prepared to provide bus services for children living more than three miles from their school, or sometimes less if special reasons existed. Now it has been decided that if a group of parents ask for help in organizing transport they will be prepared to go ahead, provided the arrangement will not lose money and that children taking part will be attending their nearest school.

The new scheme is to be tried out this term for children living at Milton who attend Impington school. The children live just within the three-mile limit and the Council has said in the past it will not undertake to provide free transport to the school. But now they have agreed to organize a bus service from Milton to Impington and back, a plan which has the support of the school's headmaster.

Between 50 and 60 parents have said they would like their children to take part in. Final calculations have still to be carried out, but a council official has said the cost of parents should be less than $6.50 a tenn.

They have been able to arrange the service at a low cost because there is already an agreement with the bus company for a bus to take children who live further away to Impington. The same bus would now just make an extra journey to pick up the Milton children. The official said they would get in touch with other groups of parents who in the past had asked if transport could be provided for their children, to see if they would like to take part in the new scheme.

The new bus service will run__________.

  • A. on morning journeys to school only
  • B. in connection with an existing service
  • C. only for children living more than three miles away
  • D. only in wet weather
标记 纠错
9.

A new scheme for getting children to and from school is being started by the education authorities in part of Eastern England. This could end the worries of many parents fearful for their children's safety on the roads.

Until now the Country Council has only been prepared to provide bus services for children living more than three miles from their school, or sometimes less if special reasons existed. Now it has been decided that if a group of parents ask for help in organizing transport they will be prepared to go ahead, provided the arrangement will not lose money and that children taking part will be attending their nearest school.

The new scheme is to be tried out this term for children living at Milton who attend Impington school. The children live just within the three-mile limit and the Council has said in the past it will not undertake to provide free transport to the school. But now they have agreed to organize a bus service from Milton to Impington and back, a plan which has the support of the school's headmaster.

Between 50 and 60 parents have said they would like their children to take part in. Final calculations have still to be carried out, but a council official has said the cost of parents should be less than $6.50 a tenn.

They have been able to arrange the service at a low cost because there is already an agreement with the bus company for a bus to take children who live further away to Impington. The same bus would now just make an extra journey to pick up the Milton children. The official said they would get in touch with other groups of parents who in the past had asked if transport could be provided for their children, to see if they would like to take part in the new scheme.

?Agreement to pay for the new bus service has been obtained from__________.

  • A. the school's headmaster
  • B. the education department
  • C. the bus company
  • D. the parents
标记 纠错
10.

A new scheme for getting children to and from school is being started by the education authorities in part of Eastern England. This could end the worries of many parents fearful for their children's safety on the roads.

Until now the Country Council has only been prepared to provide bus services for children living more than three miles from their school, or sometimes less if special reasons existed. Now it has been decided that if a group of parents ask for help in organizing transport they will be prepared to go ahead, provided the arrangement will not lose money and that children taking part will be attending their nearest school.

The new scheme is to be tried out this term for children living at Milton who attend Impington school. The children live just within the three-mile limit and the Council has said in the past it will not undertake to provide free transport to the school. But now they have agreed to organize a bus service from Milton to Impington and back, a plan which has the support of the school's headmaster.

Between 50 and 60 parents have said they would like their children to take part in. Final calculations have still to be carried out, but a council official has said the cost of parents should be less than $6.50 a tenn.

They have been able to arrange the service at a low cost because there is already an agreement with the bus company for a bus to take children who live further away to Impington. The same bus would now just make an extra journey to pick up the Milton children. The official said they would get in touch with other groups of parents who in the past had asked if transport could be provided for their children, to see if they would like to take part in the new scheme.

?The parents the Council is now going to contact are those__________.

  • A. who had not yet answered letters
  • B. who didn't want to pay
  • C. whose children stayed away from school
  • D. who had asked about transport before
标记 纠错
11.

What stage can the following grammar activity be used at?

The teacher asked students to arrange the words of sentences into different columns marked subject, predicate, object, object complement, adverbial and so on.

  • A. Presentation
  • B. Practice
  • C. Production
  • D. Preparation
标记 纠错
12.

__________ your valuable help, we couhtn't have finished the experiment ahead of time.

  • A. If it were not for
  • B. Had it not been for
  • C. Were it not for
  • D. If it has not been for
标记 纠错
13.

Which of the following is NOT a compound word?

  • A. landlady
  • B. greenhouse
  • C. uplift
  • D. unacceptable
标记 纠错
14.

In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We're pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. I've twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. We see our kids' college background as a prize demonstrating how well we've raised them. But we can't acknowledge that our obsession is more about us than them. So we've contrivedvarious justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths. It actually doesn't matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford.

We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won't be enough prizes to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever. Underlying the hysteria is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that is plausible--and mostly wrong. We haven't found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters. Selective schools don't systematically employ better instructional approaches than less selective schools. On two measures--professor's feedback and the number of essay exams--selective schools do slightly worse.

By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates' lifetime earnings. The gain is reckoned at 2-4% for every 100-point increase in a school's average SAT scores. But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke. A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as such as graduates from higher-status schools.

Kids count more than their colleges. Getting into Yale may signify intelligence, talent and ambition. But it's not the only indicator and, paradoxically, its significance is declining. The reason:

so many similar people go elsewhere. Getting into c

  • A. They have the final say in which university their children are to attend
  • B. They know best which universities are most suitable for their children
  • C. They have to carry out intensive surveys of colleges before children make an application
  • D. They care more about which college their children go to than the children themselves
标记 纠错
15.

In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We're pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. I've twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. We see our kids' college background as a prize demonstrating how well we've raised them. But we can't acknowledge that our obsession is more about us than them. So we've contrivedvarious justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths. It actually doesn't matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford.

We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won't be enough prizes to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever. Underlying the hysteria is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that is plausible--and mostly wrong. We haven't found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters. Selective schools don't systematically employ better instructional approaches than less selective schools. On two measures--professor's feedback and the number of essay exams--selective schools do slightly worse.

By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates' lifetime earnings. The gain is reckoned at 2-4% for every 100-point increase in a school's average SAT scores. But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke. A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as such as graduates from higher-status schools.

Kids count more than their colleges. Getting into Yale may signify intelligence, talent and ambition. But it's not the only indicator and, paradoxically, its significance is declining. The reason:

so many similar people go elsewhere. Getting into c

  • A. They want to increase their children's chances of entering a prestigious college
  • B. They hope their children can enter a university that offers attractive scholarships
  • C. Their children will have a wider choice of which college to go to
  • D. Elite universities now enroll fewer students than they used to
标记 纠错
16.

In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We're pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. I've twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. We see our kids' college background as a prize demonstrating how well we've raised them. But we can't acknowledge that our obsession is more about us than them. So we've contrivedvarious justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths. It actually doesn't matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford.

We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won't be enough prizes to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever. Underlying the hysteria is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that is plausible--and mostly wrong. We haven't found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters. Selective schools don't systematically employ better instructional approaches than less selective schools. On two measures--professor's feedback and the number of essay exams--selective schools do slightly worse.

By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates' lifetime earnings. The gain is reckoned at 2-4% for every 100-point increase in a school's average SAT scores. But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke. A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as such as graduates from higher-status schools.

Kids count more than their colleges. Getting into Yale may signify intelligence, talent and ambition. But it's not the only indicator and, paradoxically, its significance is declining. The reason:

so many similar people go elsewhere. Getting into c

  • A. Continuing education is more important to a person's success
  • B. A person's happiness should be valued more than their education
  • C. Kids' actual abilities are more important than their college background
  • D. What kids learn at college cannot keep up with job market requirements
标记 纠错
17.

In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We're pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. I've twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. We see our kids' college background as a prize demonstrating how well we've raised them. But we can't acknowledge that our obsession is more about us than them. So we've contrivedvarious justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths. It actually doesn't matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford.

We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won't be enough prizes to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever. Underlying the hysteria is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that is plausible--and mostly wrong. We haven't found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters. Selective schools don't systematically employ better instructional approaches than less selective schools. On two measures--professor's feedback and the number of essay exams--selective schools do slightly worse.

By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates' lifetime earnings. The gain is reckoned at 2-4% for every 100-point increase in a school's average SAT scores. But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke. A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as such as graduates from higher-status schools.

Kids count more than their colleges. Getting into Yale may signify intelligence, talent and ambition. But it's not the only indicator and, paradoxically, its significance is declining. The reason:

so many similar people go elsewhere. Getting into c

  • A. Getting into Ph.D. programs may be more competitive than getting into college
  • B. Degrees of prestigious universities do not guarantee entry to graduate programs,
  • C. Graduates from prestigious universities do not care much ahout their GRE scores
  • D. Connections built in prestigious universities may he sustained long after graduation,
标记 纠错
18.

In the college-admissions wars, we parents are the true fighters. We're pushing our kids to get good grades, take SAT preparatory courses and build resumes so they can get into the college of our first choice. I've twice been to the wars, and as I survey the battlefield, something different is happening. We see our kids' college background as a prize demonstrating how well we've raised them. But we can't acknowledge that our obsession is more about us than them. So we've contrivedvarious justifications that turn out to be half-truths, prejudices or myths. It actually doesn't matter much whether Aaron and Nicole go to Stanford.

We have a full-blown prestige panic; we worry that there won't be enough prizes to go around. Fearful parents urge their children to apply to more schools than ever. Underlying the hysteria is the belief that scarce elite degrees must be highly valuable. Their graduates must enjoy more success because they get a better education and develop better contacts. All that is plausible--and mostly wrong. We haven't found any convincing evidence that selectivity or prestige matters. Selective schools don't systematically employ better instructional approaches than less selective schools. On two measures--professor's feedback and the number of essay exams--selective schools do slightly worse.

By some studies, selective schools do enhance their graduates' lifetime earnings. The gain is reckoned at 2-4% for every 100-point increase in a school's average SAT scores. But even this advantage is probably a statistical fluke. A well-known study examined students who got into highly selective schools and then went elsewhere. They earned just as such as graduates from higher-status schools.

Kids count more than their colleges. Getting into Yale may signify intelligence, talent and ambition. But it's not the only indicator and, paradoxically, its significance is declining. The reason:

so many similar people go elsewhere. Getting into c

  • A. they earn less than their peers from other institutions
  • B. they turn out to be less competitive in the job market
  • C. they experience more job dissatisfaction after graduation
  • D. they overemphasize their qualifications in job applications
标记 纠错
19.

After four months in foreign parts, every hour at home was__________.

  • A. valuable
  • B. precious
  • C. costly
  • D. luxurious
标记 纠错
20.

According to Bartlett,reflective teaching includes five stages,that is,mapping, informing and three other stages EXCEPT__________.

  • A. monitoring
  • B. contesting
  • C. appraisal
  • D. acting
标记 纠错
21.

In English teaching, teachers should NOT pay attention to__________.

  • A. providing independent learning and communicating opportunities for students
  • B. correcting students' mistakes and errors in the process of learning immediately
  • C. encouraging students to discuss, cooperate, experience, practice, and explore the way to master English
  • D. cultivating students' interest
标记 纠错
22.

Teaching cases mainly include teaching reflection, teaching record, and__________.

  • A. instructional design
  • B. teaching activities
  • C. teaching progress
  • D. teaching cases
标记 纠错
23.

What purpose does NOT post-listening activities serve?

  • A. Helping students relate the text with their personal experience
  • B. Offering students the opportunities of extending other language skills
  • C. Practicing students' ability of matching the pre-listening predictions with contents of the text
  • D. Giving the answer directly to students and not to explain
标记 纠错
24.

New curriculum promotes the three-dimensional teaching objective which includes__________.

  • A. knowledge, skills and methods
  • B. emotional attitude and values
  • C. knowledge, skills and emotion
  • D. knowledge and skills; process and methods; emotional attitude and values
标记 纠错
25.

It took many months of __________to build the house.

  • A. job
  • B. work
  • C. labour
  • D. task
标记 纠错
26.

How many liaisons of sound are there in the sentence "He fetched it for me"?

  • A. one
  • B. two
  • C. three
  • D. four
标记 纠错
27.

It is futile to discuss the matter further, because__________going to agree upon anything today.

  • A. neither you nor I are
  • B. neither you nor me is
  • C. neither you nor I am
  • D. neither me nor you are
标记 纠错
28.

Children __________ a lot of energy and may need more high-energy food than adults.

  • A. spend
  • B. take
  • C. cost
  • D. expend
标记 纠错
29.

The word holiday originally meant holy day; but now the word signifies any day which we don't have to work. This is an example of__________.

  • A. meaning shift
  • B. widening of meaning
  • C. narrowing of meaning
  • D. loss of meaning
标记 纠错
30.

I left my pen on the desk and now it's gone; who__________it?

  • A. took
  • B. has taken
  • C. will take
  • D. had taken
标记 纠错
问答题 (共3题,共3分)
31.

根据题目要求完成下列任务,用中文作答。

教师课堂中纠错的意义及策略有哪些?

标记 纠错
32.

根据题目要求完成下列任务,用中文作答。

根据以下所给语言素材和教学目标,完成下面问题。

【语言素材】

A: What would you like for lunch?

B: I'd like some green beans, please.

A : Sure.

B : Thank you.

A: What would you like for lunch?

C: I'd like some eggplant, please.

A: Sorry, no eggplant.

Knowledge objectives: Students could ask someone and express own love for food, such as"What would you like?I'd like ... I like ..."

Ability objectives: Train students'speaking ability through dialogue practice.

Emotional objectives: Develop students'good eating habits.

(1)分析明确教学目标的作用。(10分)

(2)案例中的课时教学目标存在什么问题?请简要分析。(10分)

(3)根据以上问题,修改该教学目标。(10分)

标记 纠错
33.

根据提供的信息和语言素材设计教学方案。用英文作答。?

33.设计任务:请阅读下面学生信息和语言素材,设计一节英语听说课的教学方案。教案没有固定格式,但须包含下列要点:?

·teaching objectives

· teaching contents

· key and difficult points

· major steps and time allocation

· activities and justifications

教学时间:45分钟?

学生概况:某城镇普通中学八年级(初中二年级)学生,班级人数40人,多数已经达到《义务教育英语课程标准(2011版)》四级水平,学生课堂参与积极性一般。?

语言素材:?

中学英语学科知识与教学能力,点睛提分卷,2021年教师资格证《英语学科知识与教学能力》(初级中学)点睛试卷5

中学英语学科知识与教学能力,点睛提分卷,2021年教师资格证《英语学科知识与教学能力》(初级中学)点睛试卷5

标记 纠错

答题卡(剩余 道题)

单选题
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
问答题
31 32 33
00:00:00
暂停
交卷