When George Osbome,Chancellor of the Exchequer,is spotted outside Westminster,he is very often making an appearance on a building site,wearing a fluorescent safety jacket.It was no surprise to hear him claim once again,in his budget speech on March 19th,that"We're getting Britain building".Sadly,given the huge exlenl of Britain's housing shortage,the chancellor's proposed interventions do not add up to much.The biggest announcement was that the government will extend Help to Buy,a scheme that guarantees mortgages for people purchasing newly built homes.Mr Osbome also hopes to build a new town at Ebbsfleet,a patch of post-industrial land in the Thames estuary,and promises to speed up the redevelopment of several rotting 1960s and 1970s social housing estates in London.By making it easier for house builders to shift their stock,Help to Buy has probably helped boost building slightly,especially in northern cities where construction had all but ceased.Extending the programme will boost Britain's housing stock by 120,000 by 2020,the Treasury cltums,though it will also expose taxpayers to any future house-price crash.Mr Osborne also announced a new fund to support lending io smaU house builders-who have sLruggled to get financing in recent years which ought to have a similar effect.The new town is more advencurous.Ebbsfleei.where a high-speed rail link to London opened in 2007,has had plans for new homes for almost 20 years.Few have been built,mosdy because the site is a partially flooded quarry with little in the way of shops.public transport or infrastructure.The government's new idea is to create a development corporation with control over planning and the ability to borrow to clean up and prepare the site.That was how post-war new towns such as Milton Keynes and Stevenage were built.A sinular interventionism is visible in the plan to rebuild 1960s estates.Many of these,such as the Aylesbury Estate in SouLhwark and Robin Hood Gardens in Tower Hamlets,are crummbling.By increasing the density on the sites,and using the proceeds of selling the extra houses built,it ought to be possible to cover the cost of reconstniclion.Bui counciLs have been short of money to do much themselves,and private developers extract high retums in exchange for putting up capital.With central-govemment money,those projects ought to move quicker and councils ought to get more for their land.
We can learn from Paragraph 3 that extending Help to Buy_____
推理题。根据extending Help to Buy定位到第三段第二、三行Extending the programme，其中the programme指代Help to Buy。故答案句为：Extending the programme will boost Britain's housing stock by 120,000 by 2020,the Treasury claims,though it will also expose taxpayers Lo any future house-price crash,该句大意为“财政部表示，到2020年，延长购房支持计划预计能为英国新增12万套新房供给，虽然纳税人会有承担未来房价崩盘的风险。”通过这句话得出结论：延长购房支持计划有利有弊。（最好加上一句具体的解释：提供新房供给是“利”，房价崩盘的风险是“弊”）其中，boost为正面词汇，crash为负面词汇。[A]will bring numerous benefits“将会带来许多好处”；原文说的是有利有弊，该项表述过于片面，故排除。[B]may gready boost the stock market“可能大大推动股市”；原文说的是boost housing stock“提高住房存量”而非boost siock market“推动股市”，该项属于偷换概念。[C]will do more harm than good“将弊大于利”；原文提到有利有弊，但是没有说哪方面更严重，故该项也非答案。[D]may be both constructive and risky“可能既具有建设性，又具有风险性”；该项即原文提到的“有利有弊”，故[D]为正确答案。
