当前位置:首页职业资格银行招聘银行招聘综合知识->资料:Demystifyinghowsocialandhum

资料:Demystifying how social and human-like robots work is vital so that we can understand and shape how they will affect our future, Dr Hatice Gunes will tell the Hay Festival next week. (1)

  Fear mongering and myth-making about human-like and social robots is stopping us from engaging with the technology behind them and having an input into how they—and we—evolve, says Hatice Gunes, Associate Professor at University of Cambridge's Computer Laboratory. (2)

  Dr Gunes will be speaking about her research at the Hay Festival on 1st June and says we need to move beyond sensationalist portrayals of human-like robot. Her Hay talk will centre on human robot interaction [ HRI] and how it can be used for our benefit, for instance, for helping children with autism learn how to read expressions and to stimulate the senses of elderly people in care. (3)

  Dr Gunes will outline how HRI works. She says it has to be believable in order to be effective. That means robots’ appearance is very important. This is what has driven the development of humanoid robots with arms and aspects of a human face which can behave in a human-like way, for instance, moving their arms, legs and eyes. However, more important than appearance is their behaviour and emotional expressivity. Dr Gunes refers to the way we relate to Disney’s animated characters. “People believe in them because they can portray emotion,” she says. (4)

  To achieve expressivity requires an understanding of how human emotions are portrayed and triggered. Scientists have been working on artificial emotional intelligence which enables new technology such as embodied agents and robots to both express and detect emotions, understanding non-verbal cues. Dr Gunes cites the work of Charles Darwin on the visual nature of emotions and how they can be mapped to various changes in facial expressions. (5)

  Her research investigates how humanoids can be programmed not only to extract and respond to facial clues to emotions, but also to understand the context in which those emotions are expressed. That means they will be able to offer a response that is sensitive to specific contexts. (6)

  Will robots ever be able to have emotions themselves though? Dr Gunes says there is no reason why not and questions what emotions are. The process of working with robots on artificial emotional intelligence unpicks the nature of our emotions, showing them to be a layering of different goals, experiences and stimuli. (7)

   Another area which scientists are looking at in their quest to improve humanoids’ believability is personality. Dr Gunes has done a lot of work on personality in telepresence robotics, robots controlled remotely by a human—a kind of 3D avatar. These can be used in many ways, for instance, by medical staff to offer remote home care. The medical person can be based anywhere and operate the robot through a virtual headset. Dr Gunes is interested in how people react to the teleoperator (the human controlling the robot remotely) who is present in robot form. Once again, both the robot’s physical appearance and behaviour are important and research shows that their personality needs to be task dependent. (8)

  Dr Gunes says there remain some big challenges for scientists working on HRI, including how to process and combine all the different data they are gathering, how to modify their appearance and behaviour dynamically, and how to keep their power going 24/7. The major challenges, however, are to do with breaking down some of the myths and fears people have about humanoids. (9)

   Part of this is because they don’t understand the benefits humanoid robots can bring and why, for instance, they need to take on a human form and understand emotions. She says humanoids can be positive in terms of increasing trust and engagement among certain groups, such as the elderly; that humans tends to anthropomorphise technology in any event; and that robots can be programmed to be limited to positive emotions that promote altruism. (10)

  “People tend to love or hate robots, but they don’t really know a lot abou

  • A.Neutral
  • B.Positive
  • C.Negative
  • D.Critical
查看答案 纠错
答案: B
本题解析:

本题考查的是主旨大意。

【关键词】tone

【主题句】第12自然段She adds: “Understanding robots will empower people so they can help to shape them to do good.她补充道:“了解机器人会使人类拥有强大的力量,这样人类就可以帮助改造它们来做有益的事。”

【解析】本题问的是“哪个词最能形容本文的基调?”选项A意为“”中性。选项B意为“积极”。选项C意为“消极”。选项D意为“批评”。文章整体都在描述机器人有利于人类发展,人类不应该害怕机器人,因此本文的基调是积极的。

更新时间:2021-11-24 05:12

你可能感兴趣的试题

单选题

下列关于公司的表述,正确的是()

  • A.子公司不具有法人资格
  • B.分公司具有独立承担民亊责任的资格
  • C.—个自然人只能投资设立一个一人有限责任公司
  • D.一人有限责任公司的注册资本最低限额为人民币十万元。股东可分次足额缴纳公司章程规定的出资额
查看答案
单选题

以下各项列举了我国常见气象灾害与其发生地区的对应关系,其中正确的一项是()

  • A.洪涝一西北地区
  • B.洪涝一东北地区
  • C.春旱一华南地区
  • D.伏旱一华北地区
查看答案
单选题

根据电视收视率调査,看体育节目的观众中青年人比中老年人要多。

由此可推断出()

  • A.体育节目可能更适合青年人的兴趣
  • B.体育节目是专属青年人的运动
  • C.中老年人不喜欢体育节目
  • D.青年人比中年人更擅长体育运动
查看答案
单选题

—种海洋蜗牛产生的毒素含有多种蛋白,把其中的一种给老鼠注射后,会使有两星期大或更小的老鼠陷入睡眠状态,而使大一点的老鼠躲藏起来。当老鼠受到突然的严重威胁时,非常小的那些老鼠的反应是呆住,而较大的那些老鼠会逃跑。

以上陈述的事实最有力地支持了以下哪项假说?()

  • A.非常小的老鼠很可能与较大的老鼠一样易于遭受突发性的严重威胁
  • B.注射到鼠体的包含在蜗牛毒素中的蛋白的主要功能是通过诱导蜗牛处于完全的静止中而起到保护蜗牛的作用
  • C.如果给成年老鼠大剂量地注射这种蛋白质,也会使它们陷入睡眠状态
  • D.老鼠对突然的严重威胁的反应受其体内生成的一种化学物质的刺激,这物质与注射到老鼠体内的蛋白质相似
查看答案
单选题

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

  • A.见图A
  • B.见图B
  • C.见图C
  • D.见图D
查看答案
单选题

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

  • A.见图A
  • B.见图B
  • C.见图C
  • D.见图D
查看答案
单选题

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

  • A.见图A
  • B.见图B
  • C.见图C
  • D.见图D
查看答案
单选题

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

  • A.见图A
  • B.见图B
  • C.见图C
  • D.见图D
查看答案
单选题

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

  • A.见图A
  • B.见图B
  • C.见图C
  • D.见图D
查看答案
单选题

疾病控制中心对某校髙中三个年级的学生进行抽样做视力状况调查,抽样的方法为分层抽样(按比例抽样),若高中一、二、三年级学生人数分别为626、703、780,样本容量为84,则应从离二年级抽样的学生人数为多少?()

  • A.24
  • B.26
  • C.28
  • D.30
查看答案