当前位置:首页职业资格银行招聘银行招聘综合知识->资料:GoogleandUberhavegrabbedmos

资料:Google and Uber have grabbed most of the attention regarding the advent of self-driving cars, but on Sunday, Lyft threw down the ultimate challenge: A majority of autonomous vehicles for Lyft within a mere five years.

   The bold claim was made by Lyft co-founder John Zimmer in a post on Medium outlining his company's vision for the next decade.

  "Within five years a fully autonomous fleet of cars will provide the majority of Lyft rides across the country," said Zimmer, indicating that early versions of such cars have been in operation in San Francisco and Phoenix.

  Usually when tech founders lay out their vision, it’s typical to hear grand claims that almost push the boundaries of believability. That's what tech innovation is about. But in the case of self-driving cars, the situation is a bit more complicated.

  Uber has already begun rolling out self-driving car tests in Pittsburgh and Google is hard at work on the same kind of solution on the West Coast. Therefore, talk of getting self-driving cars on the road is, at this point, less about the technology and more about logistics. We know Google has enough cash to triple down on any initiative it decides to tackle. And as the current ride-sharing leader in the U.S., Uber has enough market share-powered credibility that a future including self-driving Uber cars isn't unrealistic.

  Today there are some internet-based ride sharing system but to overcome the critical mass the system has to be real-time, automated and extremely easy to use.

  However in the case of Lyft, which continues to struggle against Uber (one report claims that Uber has over 80 percent market share in the U.S.), such a short timeline toward rolling out a fleet of self-driving cars seems somewhat ambitious. Nevertheless, Zimmer continues his vision essay with even more bold predictions.

  "By 2025, private car ownership will all but end in major U.S. cities," says Zimmer, a prediction that, if it turns out to be true, would mean it would take just eight years for the majority of the human-driven cars on U.S. roads to disappear. Possible? Sure. Likely? Eight years seems like, once again, a bit of wishful thinking on Zimmer's part.

  Remember, it hasn't even been 10 years since the arrival of the iPhone, and as recent events prove, smartphones are still a category that can yield catastrophic results if not done right. And those are just mobile devices, not vehicles entrusted with transporting and protecting human lives.

  To be fair, Zimmer's essay does offer some facts and figures in an attempt to back up his positions, but much of it doesn't appear to take into account variables such as the heavily embedded interests of automobile companies still relying on consumer auto sales, as well as the many legal and roadway logistics that will need to be addressed in order to bring about this massive transformation in such a short time.

  Oddly, Zimmer's vision does little to address the millions of human jobs that will be lost once self-driving cars displace not only taxi drivers, but truck drivers.

  "We believe that in the first five or more years following the introduction of autonomous vehicles, the need for human drivers will actually increase, not decrease," writes Zimmer. "When autonomous cars can only solve a portion of those trips, more Lyft drivers will be needed to provide service to the growing market of former car owners," writes Zimmer.

  But what about after five years, when autonomous cars can provide full service? What about the human drivers? The pushback from human drivers losing work will likely be another, major ripple in the evolution of self-driving cars, as well as other automated systems entering U.S. society in coming years.

  However, none of these logistical issues diminish Zimmer's ideas. His vision of the future of autonomous vehicles seems quite logical and in step with most who work in and watch the space closely. But the speed bump in accepting his vision wholesale is his ambitious self-driving car timeline in general, and for Lyft in particular.

 

  • A.arrange them neatly
  • B.present clearly
  • C.design correctly
  • D.suggest properly
查看答案 纠错
答案: B
本题解析:

本题考查词义判断。

【关键词】lay out;mean

【主题句】Usually when tech founders lay out their vision it’s typical to hear grand claims that almost push the boundaries of believability. 通常情况下,当科技公司的创始人展示他们的愿景时,通常会听到一些宏大的主张,几乎令人难以置信。

【解析】题目意为“在句子‘Usually when tech founders lay out their vision it’s typical to hear grand claims that almost push the boundaries of believability.’中的lay out是指?”选项A意为“整齐地安排它们”,选项B意为“清楚地展示”,选项C意为“正确地设计”,选项D意为“适当地建议”,根据主题句句意。

更新时间:2021-11-25 14:52

你可能感兴趣的试题

单选题

下列关于公司的表述,正确的是()

  • A.子公司不具有法人资格
  • B.分公司具有独立承担民亊责任的资格
  • C.—个自然人只能投资设立一个一人有限责任公司
  • D.一人有限责任公司的注册资本最低限额为人民币十万元。股东可分次足额缴纳公司章程规定的出资额
查看答案
单选题

以下各项列举了我国常见气象灾害与其发生地区的对应关系,其中正确的一项是()

  • A.洪涝一西北地区
  • B.洪涝一东北地区
  • C.春旱一华南地区
  • D.伏旱一华北地区
查看答案
单选题

根据电视收视率调査,看体育节目的观众中青年人比中老年人要多。

由此可推断出()

  • A.体育节目可能更适合青年人的兴趣
  • B.体育节目是专属青年人的运动
  • C.中老年人不喜欢体育节目
  • D.青年人比中年人更擅长体育运动
查看答案
单选题

—种海洋蜗牛产生的毒素含有多种蛋白,把其中的一种给老鼠注射后,会使有两星期大或更小的老鼠陷入睡眠状态,而使大一点的老鼠躲藏起来。当老鼠受到突然的严重威胁时,非常小的那些老鼠的反应是呆住,而较大的那些老鼠会逃跑。

以上陈述的事实最有力地支持了以下哪项假说?()

  • A.非常小的老鼠很可能与较大的老鼠一样易于遭受突发性的严重威胁
  • B.注射到鼠体的包含在蜗牛毒素中的蛋白的主要功能是通过诱导蜗牛处于完全的静止中而起到保护蜗牛的作用
  • C.如果给成年老鼠大剂量地注射这种蛋白质,也会使它们陷入睡眠状态
  • D.老鼠对突然的严重威胁的反应受其体内生成的一种化学物质的刺激,这物质与注射到老鼠体内的蛋白质相似
查看答案
单选题

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

  • A.见图A
  • B.见图B
  • C.见图C
  • D.见图D
查看答案
单选题

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

  • A.见图A
  • B.见图B
  • C.见图C
  • D.见图D
查看答案
单选题

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

  • A.见图A
  • B.见图B
  • C.见图C
  • D.见图D
查看答案
单选题

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

  • A.见图A
  • B.见图B
  • C.见图C
  • D.见图D
查看答案
单选题

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

银行招聘职业能力测验,预测试卷,2021年银行招聘《职业能力测验》预测试卷14

  • A.见图A
  • B.见图B
  • C.见图C
  • D.见图D
查看答案
单选题

疾病控制中心对某校髙中三个年级的学生进行抽样做视力状况调查,抽样的方法为分层抽样(按比例抽样),若高中一、二、三年级学生人数分别为626、703、780,样本容量为84,则应从离二年级抽样的学生人数为多少?()

  • A.24
  • B.26
  • C.28
  • D.30
查看答案