资料：The data a bank has stored on its servers is more valuable than the gold in its vaults. Banks enjoy a monopoly over data that has helped them get away with poor services and fend off competitors. In Europe, at least, that is all about to change with a new set of regulations, named PSD2.
The rules will compel banks to share data easily with licensed third parties. Bankers in Europe complain that their profits and customer relationships are under threat. However, opening up banks, and the data they store, is good for consumers and competition, New providers will be better placed to offer all sorts of innovative services, such as a one-click option to put unspent monthly income into a pension plan.
Nevertheless, some concerns about PSD2 are legitimate. In particular, it is reasonable to wonder about the privacy and security implications of sensitive financial date being shared with third parties. But banks themselves are hardly invulnerable to cyber attacks （网络攻击）.And the solutions that the European regulators propose to deal with these worries look promising. Third parties that want to use bank data will need to convince national regulators that their data defenses are solid and are subject to annual regulatory inspections.
The gap between writing rules and implementing them is always large. First, consent from customers to provide access to their bank data must be gained explicitly, and the purposes of the data use should be clearly explained. Second, regulators must be very tough both in ensuring that banks open up their infrastructure and in withdrawing the licenses of third parties that break the rules. Third, regulators must also be flexible enough to allow for changes as the market evolves. Since the new entrants will not be licensed to engage in riskier financial activities——such as lending money——it makes sense to regulate them with a lighter touch. But if some Fintech providers do end up becoming systemically important, higher standards of oversight might be necessary.
According to the first two paragraphs, what will banks in Europe be forced to do？
本题考查的是细节理解。
【关键词】first two paragraphs；banks in Europe；forced
【主题句】第2自然段The rules will compel banks to share data easily with licensed third party.这些规则将迫使银行与持牌第三方轻松共享数据。
【解析】本题的问题是“根据前两段，欧洲银行被迫做什么?”。A选项“保持客户数据安全。”；B选项“关闭劣质服务。”；C选项“放弃他们的数据垄断。”；D选项“披露他们的利润来源。”根据主题句可知，欧洲银行被迫放弃数据垄断，与持牌第三方轻松共享数据，故选C。
下列关于公司的表述，正确的是（）
以下各项列举了我国常见气象灾害与其发生地区的对应关系，其中正确的一项是（）
根据电视收视率调査，看体育节目的观众中青年人比中老年人要多。
由此可推断出（）
—种海洋蜗牛产生的毒素含有多种蛋白，把其中的一种给老鼠注射后，会使有两星期大或更小的老鼠陷入睡眠状态，而使大一点的老鼠躲藏起来。当老鼠受到突然的严重威胁时，非常小的那些老鼠的反应是呆住，而较大的那些老鼠会逃跑。
以上陈述的事实最有力地支持了以下哪项假说？（）
疾病控制中心对某校髙中三个年级的学生进行抽样做视力状况调查，抽样的方法为分层抽样（按比例抽样），若高中一、二、三年级学生人数分别为626、703、780，样本容量为84，则应从离二年级抽样的学生人数为多少？（）
